Promises, Promises

 So, as I understand it, Trump has agreed to give $5,000 dividend checks to all Americans. He has said this multiple times ever since he campaigned for the 2024 election. And I say the same thing I've said every time we were promised the money; "I'll believe it when I actually see it in my bank account". From what I've heard though, Trump did promise that, but the democrats keep blocking it. Well, I've actually heard conflicting reports of that, so I cannot say for sure it's true or not. I'll just have to look it up and consider the source. Leftist media lies all the time about Trump. I have actually heard them do it. That's why it's hard for leftists to convince me Trump is all bad. I don't trust leftist media. Every time I hear a leftist quoting their media source, the first thing that comes to my mind is "so what happened before he said that?" Because leftists would never know that. Their media sources take out the things that would make Trump sound good, and only play the bits and pieces of his speech that would make him sound creepy if you didn't know the full context. That's why I always say context is important!

A perfect example of that is the leftists thinking that Trump said he would date his own daughter. I never saw the leftist's version of that clip, but I have the feeling the leftist media made it sound like Donald Trump did say he'd date Ivanka. So that's one reason they think Trump is a pedophile, and incestuous person. They think, as president, Trump should not even kid about stuff like that. I know Trump jokes around about a lot of things. I've watched interviews with people who have actually spoken to Trump himself, and people who have known him for years. They all say the way the leftist media portrays him is untrue. I tend to believe those people because, given the choice to lie, they choose not to.

That's another thing. A few women have claimed that Trump raped them, when in fact, he didn't. I don't believe E. Jean Caroll at all. She got a big pay-out for basically lying about Trump. A lot of people are always accusing such luminaries of things like that. I totally believe E. Jean Caroll was one of those who did. The more famous someone is, the more people will line up to accuse them of unscrupulous acts. Look at Michael Jackson. A lot of kids have said Michael Jackson was a creep who liked to have sex with kids. While others have said that isn't true. But I will tell you one thing I think; I'm pretty sure McCauley Culkin was a LOT more than a godfather to MJ's children! But I never did believe E. Jean Caroll when she accused Trump of raping her. I never believed her, and I never will believe her. She just seemed a bit too happy about getting those millions from Trump in that settlement.

I was watching a video early this morning (when I wasn't working on the AI images), and this young woman was debating with this man, named Cam Higby, the young woman rolled out every leftist media talking point known to man, and when Cam Higby corrected her with facts, she kept saying "I don't agree with you" or she would bring up some other talking point the leftists always use to make Trump look worse than he really is. For example, she asked what would make Cam believe that Trump is a rapist and a pedophile. Her mind was already set that he is, just like ALL leftists. He told her he'd have to see hard evidence that he did. Videos, pictures, testimony from other unbiased people who were there, that's a start. That's what I say too.

Some people just have it fixed in their mind that Trump is a child molester and a rapist. There seems to be no swaying them of that either. But there's been no proof he did it. You know what's funny about that? The leftists will believe Trump is a child molester with nothing more than possible circumstantial evidence (ie. the redacted Epstein files), which doesn't prove anything, but they will not believe that allowing men into womens' spaces will lead to rape, even though there have been cases of that happening. Remember the sexual molester who was in a men's prison, that claimed to be a trans-"woman"? He wanted to be transferred to a women's prison, and he was. And once he got there, he raped and molested like 3 women, and even got one pregnant. Leftists will say things like that are not happening, or are unlikely to happen. But they totally believe blacked-out Epstein files prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Trump raped children. Trump did not even want the redacted files released. He wanted ALL the files released. Yet the leftists think that because a lot of things in the files were blacked out, that it proves Trump is guilty. I say it doesn't prove anything. Leftists just always want to believe nothing but the worst about Trump.

As for men in womens' spaces, I don't care whether it happens often or not that a so-called trans-"woman" is raping real women. One is too many! And there have been well more than just that one incident than the one in the women's prison! Yes, I understand there are heterosexual rapists out there too. But they are not all pretending to be women just to get into womens' spaces. And now Biden made it a rule that if a man says he's a woman, then he can go freely into womens' spaces. So, all a man has to say is he's a woman to gain access to womens' bathrooms and locker rooms. Just like I can say I'm 10 years old to get free admission to the zoo, or ride a bus at half price, or I can say I'm half black to get a black person's scholarship. That's basically how that works. It's all the same. And it shouldn't work that way! A man should not be able to just say "I identify as a woman" and just be let into womens' spaces. He should have to provide more proof than long hair, a dress and make-up. He should have to provide reports from doctors and therapists, and any other proof they have.

I remember a video Charlie Kirk did where he asked a student "can I be a black man?" the answer was no. Of course he couldn't. But what got me about that video was there was a young, black college girl, and she flew absolutely off the handle! Calling Charlie "racist" just for bringing that up! All Charlie was doing was trying to make a point, if a man can become a woman, why can't someone somewhere down the line say they identify as a black person, just to get into black spaces? It's the same logic as a man just saying he's a woman to get into women's spaces, and it should not happen. I personally, don't give a shit enough to gain access to black only spaces. Black people used to be fun! They had a lot of personality back before the days of Obama. I don't care to go into their spaces now. I don't care to hear how miserable they are that the world is "racist", when it has nothing to do with race! It's got everything to do with their attitudes.